Mutable vs Immutable Infrastructure is a crucial topic in modern DevOps and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) practices. Understanding the difference between these two paradigms is essential for designing reliable, consistent, and scalable infrastructure.
Right from your first Terraform configuration to managing complex deployments, this concept plays a vital role in how your infrastructure is updated, maintained, and versioned.
Table of Contents
What is Mutable Infrastructure?
Mutable infrastructure refers to systems that can be modified or updated after they are provisioned. This means the underlying server or resource stays intact while its configuration, software, or settings are altered in place.
In-Place Updates and Configuration Drift
Consider a scenario where you manage a fleet of web servers running NGINX. Initially, all servers start with version 1.17. When a new version (say, 1.18 or 1.19) is released, you manually upgrade the existing servers or use tools like Ansible or shell scripts to update them in place.
This practice seems straightforward until things go wrong. One server might fail to update due to unmet dependencies, network issues, or OS mismatches. Over time, these discrepancies lead to configuration drift—where servers, despite being meant to be identical, differ in subtle ways like software versions, OS patches, or file permissions.
Risks of Mutable Infrastructure
- Inconsistency between environments
- Harder troubleshooting due to unexpected differences
- Manual effort required for updates and maintenance
- Lower repeatability and more prone to human error
While mutable infrastructure can be convenient in small setups or one-off tasks, it quickly becomes unmanageable as systems scale.
What is Immutable Infrastructure?
Immutable infrastructure is an approach where resources are never changed after creation. Instead of updating a resource in place, a new one is created with the desired changes, and the old one is removed.
Example of Immutable Practice
Back to our NGINX example—when upgrading from version 1.17 to 1.18, rather than altering the existing servers, new instances are provisioned with version 1.18 pre-installed. Once the new instances are verified, the older ones are decommissioned.
This process eliminates the possibility of partial or failed updates. If the provisioning fails, the old server remains untouched and functional.
Benefits of Immutable Infrastructure
- No configuration drift
- Higher consistency across environments
- Easier rollbacks and reproducibility
- Improved testability and version control
- Automation-friendly infrastructure lifecycle
In large-scale environments and with Infrastructure as Code tools like Terraform, this approach simplifies infrastructure management and aligns well with continuous deployment pipelines.
Terraform and Immutable Infrastructure
Terraform embraces the immutable infrastructure philosophy by default.
Let’s say you define a local file resource in your .tf file and set the permission to 0777. If you later change the permission to 0700, Terraform does not simply update the file—it destroys the existing resource and creates a new one with the new permission.
This behavior helps avoid unintended side effects and ensures every change reflects exactly what’s defined in the configuration.
Controlling Resource Lifecycle with Terraform
While Terraform prefers immutability, there are ways to customize this behavior using lifecycle rules.
Terraform Lifecycle Options:
create_before_destroy– Ensures the new resource is created before deleting the old one. Useful to avoid downtime.prevent_destroy– Prevents accidental deletion of critical resources.ignore_changes– Ignores specified changes in resource attributes.
By combining immutability with lifecycle customizations, Terraform provides flexibility while maintaining infrastructure consistency.
Immutable Infrastructure in CI/CD Pipelines
In modern DevOps workflows, immutable infrastructure fits naturally within CI/CD pipelines. It allows:
- Automated testing of infrastructure changes
- Reliable rollouts and easy versioning
- Simplified blue/green deployments and canary releases
- Seamless collaboration in teams
Versioned infrastructure also improves compliance and auditability—crucial for regulated environments.
Mutable vs Immutable Infrastructure: Summary
| Feature | Mutable Infrastructure | Immutable Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|
| Resource Changes | In-place | Replace with new |
| Configuration Drift | Likely | Eliminated |
| Rollback Support | Complex | Simple (create older version) |
| DevOps Automation | Manual or scripted | Fully automatable |
| Error Risk | Higher | Lower |
| Terraform Compatibility | Not recommended | Preferred |
Conclusion
Understanding mutable vs immutable infrastructure helps in making informed decisions while designing, scaling, or maintaining cloud environments. While mutable infrastructure might seem easy initially, it introduces complexity and risk over time.
On the other hand, immutable infrastructure, especially when managed through Terraform, ensures consistency, eliminates drift, and aligns perfectly with modern DevOps and IaC workflows.
By embracing immutability and combining it with Terraform lifecycle controls, you can build infrastructure that is robust, predictable, and scalable.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is the key difference between mutable and immutable infrastructure?
Mutable infrastructure allows in-place updates, while immutable infrastructure replaces existing resources with new ones during updates.
2. Why does Terraform destroy and recreate resources?
Terraform follows the immutable infrastructure model, ensuring changes result in clean, consistent infrastructure by default.
3. Can I control Terraform’s destroy behavior?
Yes, using lifecycle rules like create_before_destroy, prevent_destroy, and ignore_changes.
4. Is configuration drift possible with immutable infrastructure?
No, since every change involves creating new resources, configuration drift is effectively eliminated.
5. When should I use mutable infrastructure?
Only in small-scale or non-critical environments where speed matters more than consistency and traceability.